Julia Grabher vs Caty McNally Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 31 May at 03:47 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Grabher vs C. McNally

AUT
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Grabher 1 - 0 McNally
They have played 2 sets in total, with Julia Grabher winning 2 and Caty McNally winning 0. The last match between Julia Grabher and Caty McNally was at the W75 Brescia, 31-05-2025, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Julia Grabher getting the victory 6-4 3-1 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Grabher | 1 |
| McNally | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(SF) W75 Brescia(05-31-25)
J. Grabher vs C. McNally H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $402,254 | Career Prize Money | $1,334,271 |
| 60.78% (423-273) | Career Total W/L | 60.24% (197-130) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 18 | Titles | 6 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 21.43% (3-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 47.62% (10-11) |
J. Grabher vs C. McNally Match Preview:
- Recent performance shows Grabher has a stronger second serve, winning 38.05% of points compared to Mc Nally's 32.16%.
- Mc Nally excels in return games, securing 53.75% of points on opponent's second serves, outpacing Grabher at 46.29%.
- Among first serve returns, Mc Nally leads with 34.68% success against Grabher's 30.8%.
- Who handles pressure better? Grabher, who saves 45.13% of breakpoints, has the edge over Mc Nally's 36.59%.
- Performance overview reveals Grabher has a notable advantage with a 64.94% win rate, while Mc Nally has yet to secure a match victory.
- Have they faced strong opponents? Both have, but Grabher’s competition averaged a rank of 296.09.
- Considering deciding set records, Grabher triumphs in 47% of deciding sets, while Mc Nally falls short at 0%.
- Mc Nally shows stronger breakpoint conversion, capitalizing on 45.5% of opportunities over Grabher’s 38.12%.
- Could current event performance provide insights? It often hints at which player is in form at a given tournament.
Editorial Prediction (May 31, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Mc Nally and Grabher offers intriguing contrasts in playing style and recent form. Grabher’s superior second serve suggests an advantage in longer rallies and point construction, an area where Mc Nally seems to lag behind.
However, where Mc Nally shines is in return games, displaying a knack for taking control of opponent's serves, particularly on the second effort. This return strength could counterbalance the serving disparity to some extent.
When pressure builds, Grabher tends to perform better, as shown by her breakpoint save percentages, indicating a psychological edge in tight situations.
Breakdown of match wins over the past year heavily favors Grabher, who maintains an impactful win record. Mc Nally's lack of victories places her at a statistical disadvantage.
Given these dynamics, coupled with Grabher's success in deciding sets, she appears positioned as the likely favorite to win this encounter, unless Mc Nally leverages her returning skills to their fullest potential.
Julia Grabher vs Caty McNally Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Grabher vs C. McNally H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 9 | Games Won | 5 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:6:21 | Average Match Time | 1:6:21 |
| 69% (33/48) | 1st Serve % | 79% (33/42) |
| 64% (21/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (19/33) |
| 67% (10/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (4/9) |
| 100% (3/3) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
| 45% (19/42) | Return Points Win % | 35% (17/48) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Grabher Recent Matches Played
C. McNally Recent Matches Played

J. Grabher vs C. McNally Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.78% (423/273) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.24% (197/130) |
| 59.14% (932/644) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.40% (438/312) |
| 54.15% (7707/6526) | Games Win/Loss | 53.72% (3649/3143) |
| 44.78% (30/37) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.19% (85/69) |
| 65.67% (373/195) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.97% (46/32) |
| 34.55% (19/36) | Indoor Hard W/L | 71.15% (37/15) |
| 16.67% (1/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 67.44% (29/14) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 746 | Aces Total | 601 |
| 0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.4 |
| 2631 | Total Double Faults | 1315 |
| 1:22:28 | Average Match Time | 1:32:18 |
| 474.92 | Average Opponent Rank | 331.44 |
| 65% (25496/39392) | 1st Serve % | 65% (13438/20584) |
| 62% (15877/25496) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (8464/13438) |
| 45% (6208/13894) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (3165/7146) |
| 49% (2555/5214) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1311/2624) |
| 47% (18795/39983) | Return Points Win % | 46% (9673/20831) |
| 34.48% (10/19) | Slam W/L | 50.00% (19/19) |
| 47.06% (8/9) | Masters W/L | 40.00% (12/18) |
| 31.82% (7/15) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33.90% (20/39) | Main Tour W/L | 52.75% (48/43) |
| 64.09% (282/158) | Challenger W/L | 70.34% (102/43) |
| 74.42% (96/33) | Futures W/L | 69.57% (16/7) |
| 61% (416/683) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (194/322) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (69/136) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (28/57) |
| 54% (103/191) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (54/101) |
| 90% (408/367) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (202/171) |
| 10% (408/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (202/31) |
| 20% (288/58) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (125/25) |